Yes. We can build a contract toolkit (templates + clause library + negotiation guidelines) so your team moves faster with consistent risk controls.

Enforceability depends on the province, context, and how narrowly the clause is drafted. Overbroad restrictions can be unenforceable.

Use a contractor agreement that clearly assigns IP to the company, includes confidentiality obligations, and addresses use of third-party materials.

It caps exposure if something goes wrong. Without it, a dispute can become far more expensive than the contract value.

Not always. NDAs are useful in certain situations, but many investors and partners won’t sign. We can recommend practical alternatives.

Yes, when appropriate. We can handle negotiations or support you behind the scenes—depending on what you prefer.

Scope/deliverables, payment terms, termination rights, liability/indemnities, and IP ownership are the most common friction points.

Master Services Agreement (MSA) establishes the overarching legal framework for the relationship, including liability allocation, payment mechanics, IP ownership, and termination rights.

A Statement of Work (SOW) sits under the MSA and defines the specific services or deliverables, timelines, pricing, and performance requirements for a particular engagement.

It depends on length, complexity, and urgency. We can often prioritize time-sensitive reviews when possible.

Templates can be a starting point, but they are rarely tailored to your specific business, industry, or risk profile. Many online templates are not drafted with Canadian law in mind or fail to address key commercial realities.

A targeted legal review can identify gaps, remove inappropriate provisions, and align the agreement with how your business actually operates.